What is at stake when we talk about language?

A language ideological debate on the meanings of liiderlik

https://doi.org/10.54013/kk802a3

Keywords: language ideological debate, argumentation analysis, Estonian, standard language, language authorities

Language ideologies both reflect and (re)create our understandings of language. This article focuses on language ideological discourses where language is overtly the subject of discussion, yet other social concerns are subtly expressed in the background. What is discussed in a public language ideological debate beyond language itself? Who are the participants in such a debate? The case study that we have chosen to examine is the public debate in Estonian media on the meanings of the word liiderlik (a loanword from German liederlich, meaning ‘debauched’; and a newer loan from English leader + adjective suffix -lik, meaning ‘leader-like’) that took place in March and April 2023. We use argumentation analysis as a methodological tool to explore the debate from the perspective of how arguments are constructed to express language ideologies. Our aim is to highlight the non-linguistic social concerns that become associated with language in such a debate and are presented as language issues. The article reveals that language professionals – such as linguists, language editors, language teachers, and journalists – play a prominent role in the debate. Whereas most of them adopt the standpoint that word meanings should be standardized in a normative dictionary, some linguists advocate for the opposing view that meanings cannot be fixed. The analysis shows that there is a lot at stake for the participants in the debate: ensuring mutual understanding, the functioning of society, the quality of higher education and science, the survival of the nation and the state, and even the future of humanity. With this article, we aim to bridge the gap between linguists and other language professionals, showing that while their concerns are vital, framing them as language issues can lead to entrenched, outdated discourses.

 

Kerttu Rozenvalde (b. 1986), PhD, University of Tartu, Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics, Research Fellow in Language Policy (Jakobi 2-437, 51005 Tartu), kerttu.rozenvalde@ut.ee

Kristel Algvere (b. 1989), MA, University of Tartu, Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics, Doctoral Student, Junior Research Fellow in Linguistics (Jakobi 2-431, 51005 Tartu), kristel.algvere@ut.ee

Kirjandus

KIRJANDUS

Althusser, Louis 1976. On Ideology. London: Verso.

Ammon, Ulrich 2015. On the social forces that determine what is standard in a language – with a look at the norms of non-standard language varieties. – Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée. Erinumber, nr 3, lk 53–67.

Annist, Aet; Kaaristo, Maarja 2023. Antropoloogia kujunemine ja uurimislugu. – Sotsiaal- ja kultuuriantropoloogia. Õpik kõrgkoolidele. (Gigantum humeris.) Toim A. Annist, M. Kaaristo. 2., täiendatud tr. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus, lk 15–64.

Ayres-Bennett, Wendy 2021. Modelling language standardization. – The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization. (Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics.) Toim W. Ayres-Bennett, John Bellamy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 27–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559249

Bauman, Richard; Briggs, Charles L. 2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Policies of Inequality. (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 21.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486647

Blommaert, Jan 1999. The debate is open. – Language Ideological Debates. (Language, Power and Social Process 2.) Toim J. Blommaert. Berlin–New York: De Gruyter Mouton, lk 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808049

Bourdieu, Pierre 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Tlk Gino Raymond, Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Cameron, Deborah 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.

Chalvin, Antoine 2023. Johannes Aavik ja eesti keeleuuendus. (Gigantum humeris.) Tlk Heete Sahkai. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Davies, Winifred V. 2000. Language awareness amongst teachers in a Central German dialect area. – Language Awareness, kd 9 , nr 3, lk 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667141

Foucault, Michel 2005 [1971]. Diskursuse kord. Collège de France’i inauguratsiooniloeng 2. detsembril 1970. Tlk Marek Tamm. Tallinn: Varrak.

Garrett, Peter 2010. Attitudes to Language. (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844713

Gordin, Michael D. 2015. Scientific Babel: How Science Was Done Before and After Global English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226000329.001.0001

Gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava 2011. – Riigi Teataja I, 14. I 2011, 2. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/108032023006?leiaKehtiv

Haugen, Einar 1987. Blessings of Babel: Bilingualism and Language Planning: Problems and Pleasures. (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 46.) Berlin–Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110862966

Jõgever, Jaan 1913. Õigekeelsus ja õigekiri. – Eesti Kirjandus, nr 8, lk 289–303.

Kaplinski, Jaan 2020. Eesti, estoranto ja teised keeled. (Bibliotheca controversiarum.) Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Keeleaps tõi pahameeletormi. Doktorant: keeleteadlane ei ole kõndiv õigekeelsussõnaraamat. – Delfi 18. III 2023. https://www.delfi.ee/artikkel/120159598/keeleaps-toi-pahameeletormi-doktorant-keeleteadlane-ei-ole-kondiv-oigekeelsussonaraamat

KeeleS = Riigi Teataja I, 18. III 2011, 1. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/118032011001

Klaas-Lang, Birute 2022. Birute Klaas-Lang: meie ühiskonda ähvardab lõhestada ka keelekriis. – ERR 19. X. https://www.err.ee/1608756460/birute-klaas-lang-meie-uhiskonda-ahvardab-lohestada-ka-keelekriis

Klaas-Lang, Birute; Metslang, Helle 2018. Eesti keele kestlikkus kõrghariduses. – Akadeemia, nr 4, lk 667–688.

Koreinik, Kadri 2023. Extralinguistic arguments in 21st century language planning discourse: A „superdictionary” between language standardization from above and below. – Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics, kd 14, nr 1. https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2023.14.1.04

Koreinik, Kadri; Praakli, Kristiina 2013. Keele kestlikkuse ja kao konstrueerimine poolavalikes diskursustes. – Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, kd 9, lk 131–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa9.09

Koreinik, Kadri; Mandel, Aive; Pilvik, Maarja-Liisa; Praakli, Kristiina; Vihman, Virve-Anneli 2023. Outsourcing teenage language: a participatory approach for exploring speech and text messaging. – Linguistics Vanguard, kd 9, nr 4, lk 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0152

Langemets, Margit; Risberg, Lydia; Tavast, Arvi; Päll, Peeter; Raadik, Maire; Paet, Tiina 2022. Keelekorraldajad: keele muutumisega kaasneb alati ka selle üle muretsemine. – ERR 2. XII. https://www.err.ee/1608807802/keelekorraldajad-keele-muutumisega-kaasneb-alati-ka-selle-ule-muretsemine

Lindström, Liina; Risberg, Lydia; Plado, Helen 2023. Language ideologies and beliefs about language in Estonia and Estonian language planning. – Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics, kd 14, nr 1, lk 7–48. https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2023.14.1.01

Lippi-Green, Rosina 2012. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203348802

Milroy, James 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. – Journal of Sociolinguistics, kd 5, nr 4, lk 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163

OECD ülevaade 2020. Haridus ja Teadusministeeriumi koduleht, 26. XI. https://www.hm.ee/uudised/oecd-ulevaade-koroonakriis-voimendab-teadlaste-ja-teaduskoostoo-rolli-uhiskonnas

Plado, Helen; Lindström, Liina; Iva, Sulev 2023. Võro South Estonian. – The Uralic Languages. 2. tr. Toim Daniel Abondolo, Riitta-Liisa Valijärvi. London: Routledge, lk 386−432. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625096-9

Põhikooli riiklik õppekava 2011. – Riigi Teataja I, 14. I 2011, 1. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/129082014020?leiaKehtiv

Risberg, Lydia 2024. Sõnatähendused ja sõnaraamat. Kasutuspõhine sisend eesti keelekorraldusele. (Dissertationes philologiae estonicae Universitatis Tartuensis 52.) Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Risberg, Lydia; Langemets, Margit 2023. Sõnatähenduste normimise traditsioon ja selle murdmine eesti keelekorralduses. – Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics, kd 14, nr 1, lk 49–80. https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2023.14.1.02

Safford, Thomas G.; Whitmore, Emily H.; Hamilton, Lawrence C. 2021. Follow the scientists? How beliefs about the practice of science shaped COVID-19 views. – JCOM, kd 20, nr 07, A03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20070203

Sakova, Aija 2024. Võtta sõna ja rääkida teadusest – miks ja kuidas? – Sirp 24. V, lk 16–17. https://www.sirp.ee/s1-artiklid/c21-teadus/votta-sona-ja-raakida-teadusest-miks-ja-kuidas/

Schieffelin, Bambi B.; Woolard, Kathryn A.; Kroskrity, Paul V. (toim) 1998. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 16.) New York–Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Silverstein, Michael 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. The elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels: Including Papers from the Conference on Non Slavic Languages of the USSR. Toim Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, Carol L. Hofbauer. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, lk 193–247.

Soler, Josep; Rozenvalde, Kerttu 2021. The Englishization of higher education in Estonia and Latvia: Actors, positionings, and linguistic tensions. – The Englishization of Higher Education in Europe. Toim Robert Wilkinson, René Gabriels. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, lk 57−75. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463727358

Sova, Henrik 2024. Teaduse ja ühiskonna usalduskriisi taga on ülepaisutatud ootused. – Postimees 13. III. https://arvamus.postimees.ee/7978847/henrik-sova-teaduse-ja-uhiskonna-usalduskriisi-taga-on-ulepaisutatud-ootused

Tavast, Arvi 2024. Keeleminutid: teaduse kõlblik kuni. – ERR 11. III. https://kultuur.err.ee/1609278456/keeleminutid-teaduse-kolblik-kuni

Undusk, Jaan 2012. Luterlik, valgustuslik ja romantiline keeleideoloogia meie vanemas kirjakultuuris. – Vikerkaar, nr 10–11, lk 73–90.

Uusberg, Andero 2023. Andero Uusberg: keset kriise elamine eeldab psühholoogilist säilenõtkust. Intervjueeris Juhan Hellerma. – ERR, Novaator 12. II. https://novaator.err.ee/1608881366/andero-uusberg-keset-kriise-elamine-eeldab-psuhholoogilist-sailenotkust

Uusberg, Andero 2024. Inimesed otsivad konfliktist teisi psühholoogilisi hüvesid. Intervjueeris Merilin Pärli. – ERR, Novaator 9. III. https://novaator.err.ee/1609276931/andero-uusberg-inimesed-otsivad-konfliktist-teisi-psuhholoogilisi-huvesid

Vaicekauskienė, Loreta 2012. ’Good Language’ and insecure speakers: A study into metalinguistic awareness of TV and radio journalists in the context of Language. – Multiple Perspectives in Linguistic Research on Baltic Languages. Toim Aurelija Usonienė, Nicole Nau, Ineta Dabašinskienė. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, lk 76–103.

Vainik, Ene; Paulsen, Geda 2023. Kujundlik mõtlemine 2020.–2022. aasta keelekriisis. –Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 7, lk 651–677. http://doi.org/10.54013/kk787a1

Valk, Aune 2010. Keel ja identiteet. Keele roll eestlaste identiteedis. – Eestlased ja eesti keel välismaal. Toim Kristiina Praakli, Jüri Viikberg. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus, lk 113−141.

van Eemeren, Frans H.; Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca 2016. Argumentation: Analysis and Evaluation. 2. tr. New York–London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315401140

van Eemeren, Frans H.; Houtlosser, Peter 2002. Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. – Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Wrap and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. (Argumentation Library 6.) Toim F. H. van Eemeren, P. Houtlosser. Dordrecht: Springer, lk 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9948-1

van Eemeren, Frans H.; Garssen, Bart; Krabbe, Erik C. W.; Snoeck Henkemans, A. Fransciska; Verheij, Bart; Wagemans, Jean H. M. 2014. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5

Vessey, Rachelle 2013. Too much French? Not enough French?: The Vancouver Olympics and a very Canadian language ideological debate. – Multilingua, kd 32, nr 5, lk 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0031

Viht, Annika; Habicht, Külli 2022. Baltisaksa periood eesti keele korralduses (Vaateid eesti keelekorralduse arenguloole). – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 11, lk 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.54013/kk779a4

Woolard, Kathryn A. 2020. Language ideology. – The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology. Toim James Stanlaw. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0217

Keel ja kirjandus