Two sides of the same crisis
Metaphorical perspectives of healthcare leaders on coping with the COVID-19 crisis
Keywords: COVID-19, Cognitive Metaphor Theory, metaphors, public sector, leadership, Estonian
While many studies have examined metaphors in COVID-19 discourse, few have focused on how healthcare leaders use metaphors to reflect on the crisis from a post-pandemic perspective. This study analyzes the conceptual metaphors used in reflective discourse by Estonian healthcare leaders to better understand the challenges of medical crisis management and preparedness.
The material is drawn from the 2023 Estonian Health Board report COVID-19 Pandemic Descriptive Analysis and Lessons Learned, which includes a medical overview by virologist Irja Lutsar and interviews with 20 crisis-management experts conducted by Kantar Emor. Grounded in Cognitive Metaphor Theory (CMT), the study compares metaphor use in scientific and everyday discourse, treating them as two complementary perspectives on the same crisis. It explores how these metaphors offer insights into how healthcare leaders conceptualized and made sense of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The analysis shows that the medical overview maintains a neutral, statistics-oriented tone and relies on conventional metaphors, primarily framing the pandemic as a natural force, with only occasional and superficial use of war metaphors. By contrast, the interviews reveal more personal and vivid imagery, often drawing on war and school metaphors. Metaphors of struggle and burden highlight the increased workload and a sense of heroism among healthcare workers, while the virus itself is sometimes personified.
By considering these complementary perspectives together, the study advances understanding of healthcare leadership discourse and the role of metaphor in shaping post-pandemic policy reflection and communication.
Mai Raet (b. 1988), Tallinn University, doctoral student in linguistics (Narva mnt 25, 10120 Tallinn), mairaet@tlu.ee
Ene Vainik (b. 1964), PhD, Institute of the Estonian Language, Leading Research Fellow (Roosikrantsi 6, 10119 Tallinn), ene.vainik@eki.ee
Kirjandus
VEEBIVARAD
Quirkos = Quirkos 3 (2025) [tarkvara]. www.quirkos.com
KIRJANDUS
Ahlqvist, Annika; Nurmeksela, Anu; Kvist, Tarja 2023. The COVID-19 pandemic challenged nurse managers’ daily leadership work: A qualitative study. – Journal of Nursing Management, artikkel 8191426. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8191426
Angeli, Elizabeth L. 2012. Metaphors in the rhetoric of pandemic flu: Electronic media coverage of H1N1 and swine flu. – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, kd 42, nr 3, lk 203–222. https://doi.org/10.2190/tw.42.3.b
Athanasiadou, Angeliki 2007. On the subjectivity of intensifiers. – Language Sciences, kd 29, nr 4, lk 554–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.009
Bates, Benjamin R. 2020. The (in)appropriateness of the WAR metaphor in response to SARS-CoV-2: A rapid analysis of Donald J. Trump’s rhetoric. – Frontiers in Communication, kd 5, artikkel 50. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00050
Bylytsia, Ulana; Bilyk, Olha; Doichyk, Oksana; Ivanotchak, Nataliia; Pyliachyk, Nataliia 2022. COVID-19 metaphoric blends in media discourse. – Studies about Languages, nr 40, lk 17–33. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.40.1.30155
Cameron, Lynne 2008. Metaphor and talk. – The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology.) Toim Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. New York: Cambridge University Press, lk 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013
Cameron, Lynne; Maslen, Robert 2010. Identifying metaphors in discourse data. – Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. (Studies in Applied Linguistics.) Toim L. Cameron, R. Maslen. London: Equinox, lk 97–115.
Capra, Fritjof; Luisi, Pier Luigi 2014. Mechanistic social thought. – The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895555.006
Chapman, Connor M.; Miller, DeMond Shondell 2020. From metaphor to militarized response: The social implications of „We Are at War with COVID-19” – crisis, disasters, and pandemics yet to come. – International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, kd 40, nr 9–10, lk 1107–1124. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-05-2020-0163
Charteris-Black, Jonathan 2021. Metaphors of the pandemic: War. – J. Charteris-Black, Metaphors of Coronavirus: Invisible Enemy or Zombie Apocalypse? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, lk 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85106-4_2
Cuenca, Maria-Josep; Romano, Manuela 2024. Similes vs. metaphors. A case study on the conceptualisation of Covid-19 pandemic. – Metaphor in Socio-Political Contexts (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 54.) Toim M. Romano. Berlin–Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, lk 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111001364-002
Erelt, Tiiu 2007. Terminiõpetus. Toim Maire Raadik. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Fairclough, Norman 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2. tr. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Gadolin, Christian; Nilsson, Maria Skyvell; Larsman, Pernilla; Pousette, Anders; Törner, Marianne 2022. Managing health care under heavy stress: Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on care unit managers’ ability to support the nurses – A mixed-methods approach. – Journal of Nursing Management, kd 30, nr 8, lk 4080–4089. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13857
Garzone, Giuliana Elena 2021. Rethinking metaphors in COVID communication. – Lingue e Linguaggi, kd 44, lk 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v44p159
Gibbs, Raymond W.; Wilson, Nicole L. 2002. Bodily action and metaphorical meaning. – Style, kd 36, nr 3, lk 524–540. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.36.3.524
Glebkin, Vladimir 2013. A socio-cultural history of the machine metaphor. – Review of Cognitive Linguistics, kd 11, nr 1, lk 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.11.1.04gle
Hanks, Patrick 2006. Metaphoricity is gradable. – Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 171.) Toim Anatol Stefanowitsch, Stefan Th. Gries. Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter, lk 17–35.
Hanne, Michael 2022. How we escape capture by the „war” metaphor for COVID-19. – Metaphor and Symbol, kd 37, nr 2, lk 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1935261
Heaney, Dermot; Riboni, Giorgia 2023. When a liberal use of metaphor is really a conservative one: The case of Boris Johnson’s televised press releases. – Altre Modernità, nr 29, lk 173–194. https://doi.org/10.54103/2035-7680/20064
Imani, Aliakbar 2022. Critical metaphor analysis: A systematic step-by-step guideline. – LSP International Journal, kd 9, nr 1, lk 1–15. https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v9.17975
Jaworska, Sylvia 2020. Is the war rhetoric around Covid-19 an Anglo-American thing? – Viral Discourse 13. IV. https://viraldiscourse.com/2020/04/13/is-the-war-rhetoric-around-COVID-19-an-anglo-american-thing/
Joffe, Hélène; Haarhoff, Georgina 2002. Representations of far-flung illnesses: The case of Ebola in Britain. – Social Science & Medicine, kd 54, nr 6, lk 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00068-5
Keller, Evelyn Fox 2020. Cognitive functions of metaphor in the natural sciences. – Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, kd 45, nr 3, lk 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1794384
Kim, Jeongyeon 2022. 코로나 시대, 전쟁 은유의 수사학 (War metaphors and OVID-19). – 문화와융합, kd 44, nr 6, lk 903–924. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2022.6.44.6.903
Kruusmaa, Mirt 2020. Sõjametafoorid meditsiinis. Viirus kui nähtamatu vaenlane. – Sirp 2. V, lk 37–38. https://www.sirp.ee/s1-artiklid/c9-sotsiaalia/sojametafoorid-meditsiinis-viirus-kui-nahtamatu-vaenlane/
Kövecses, Zoltán 2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge–New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127
Lakoff, George 2006 [1993]. Conceptual metaphor: The contemporary theory of metaphor. – Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 34.) Toim Dirk Geeraerts. Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter, lk 185–238.
Lakoff, George; Johnson, Mark 2011 [1980]. Metafoorid, mille järgi me elame. (Gigantum Humeris.) Tlk Ene Vainik. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Musolff, Andreas 2006. Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. – Metaphor and Symbol, kd 21, nr 1, lk 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
Musolff, Andreas 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London–Oxford–New York–New Delhi–Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.
Musolff, Andreas 2022. „World-beating” pandemic responses: Ironical, sarcastic, and satirical use of war and competition metaphors in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. – Metaphor and Symbol, kd 37, nr 2, lk 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1932505
Naamati-Schneider, Lior; Gabay, Gillie 2022. Metaphors of war in effective and ineffective coping of medical directors of COVID-19 wards in public hospitals. – Frontiers in Public Health, kd 10, artikkel 830266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.830266
Nerlich, Brigitte; Halliday, Christopher 2007. Avian flu: The creation of expectations in the interplay between science and the media. – Sociology of Health & Illness, kd 29, nr 1, lk 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00517.x
Olza, Inés; Koller, Veronika; Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide; Pérez-Sobrino, Paula; Semino, Elena 2021. The #ReframeCovid initiative: From Twitter to society via metaphor. – Metaphor and the Social World, kd 11, nr 1, lk 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00013.olz
Pannain, Rossella; Pace, Lucia di 2022. Metonymy and the polysemy of Covid in Italian. – Review of Cognitive Linguistics, kd 20, nr 1, lk 231–257. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00109.pan
Piel, Julia; Hörold, Madlen; Brandstetter, Susanne; Drewitz, Karl-Philipp; Hrudey, Ilona; Schmitt, Rudolf; Apfelbacher, Christian 2023. COVID-19 crisis management of German ICU clinicians in leadership – a metaphor analysis. – Frontiers in Public Health, kd 11, artikkel 1160094. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1160094
Pragglejazi rühm 2007 = Pragglejaz Group, MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. – Metaphor and Symbol, kd 22, nr 1, lk 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2201_1
Raestik, Triin 2020. Voodikohtade arvu haiglates saab suurendada, kuid personalinappus ja ületöötamise oht kummitab kõiki haiglaid. – Tervisegeenius 4. XII. https://tervise.geenius.ee/rubriik/uudis/voodikohtade-arvu-haiglates-saab-suurendada-kuid-personalinappus-ja-uletootamise-oht-kummitab-koiki-haiglaid/
Raet, Mai 2024. Terminikasutuse problemaatilisusest COVID-19 näitel. – Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat 69 (2023). Peatoim Reili Argus. Tallinn: Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus, lk 229−252. http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/esa69.10
Reddy, Michael J. 1993. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. – Metaphor and Thought. 2. tr. Toim Andrew Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, lk 164–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173865.012
Reisfield, Gary M.; Wilson George R. 2004. Use of metaphor in the discourse on cancer. – Journal of Clinical Oncology, kd 22, nr 19, lk 4024–4027. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.03.136
Semino, Elena 2020. „Not soldiers but fire-fighters” – Metaphors and Covid-19. – Health Communication, kd 36, nr 1, lk 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989
Semino, Elena 2021. COVID-19: A forest fire rather than a wave? – Mètode Science Studies Journal, kd 11, lk 5. https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.11.19336
Semino, Elena; Demjén, Zsófia; Demmen, Jane 2018. An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. – Applied Linguistics, kd 39, nr 5, lk 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw028
Silaški, Nadežda; Đurović, Tatjana 2024. The explanatory function of metaphor scenario in the Serbian pro-vaccine discourse. – Russian Journal of Linguistics, kd 28, nr 1, lk 123–143. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34958
Sontag, Susan 2002. Haigus kui metafoor; Aids ja selle metafoorid. (Avatud Eesti raamat.) Tlk Krista Kaer. Tallinn: Varrak.
Steen, Gerard J.; Dorst, Aletta G.; Herrmann, J. Berenike; Kaal, Anna A.; Krennmayr, Tina; Pasma, Trijntje 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. (Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 14.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14
Stefanowitsch, Anatol 2007. Words and their metaphors: A corpus based approach. – Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Toim A. Stefanowitsch, Stefan Th. Gries. Berlin–New York: Mouton de Gruyter, lk 63–105.
TA 2023 = Irja Lutsar, Kantar Emor, COVID-19 pandeemia kirjeldav analüüs ja õppetunnid. Toim Mari-Anne Härma, Maris Jesse. Tallinn: Terviseamet. https://www.terviseamet.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2025-02/covid-19_pandeemia_analuus_2023.pdf
Tao, Ran; Kim, Sang Jung; Lu, Linqi; Kang, Jiwon; McLeod, Douglas 2023. Fighting fire or fighting war: Examining the framing effects of COVID-19 metaphors. – Health Communication, kd 39, nr 10, lk 2026–2040. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2253398
Taylor, Charlotte; Kidgell, Jasmin 2021. Flu-like pandemics and metaphor pre-Covid: A corpus investigation. – Discourse, Context & Media, kd 41, artikkel 100503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100503
Vainik, Ene; Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica; Chłopicki, Władysław 2023. Communication in times of permacrisis. Introduction to the special issue. – Tertium Linguistic Journal, kd 8, nr 1, lk 1–4.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2018. Critical Discourse Analysis. – The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2. tr. (Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics.) Toim Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, Deborah Schiffrin. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, lk 466–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
Veismann, Ann 2022. Mõistemetafoorid sõnaga aeg eesti keeles. – Keel ja Kirjandus, nr 7, lk 617–642. https://doi.org/10.54013/kk775a3
Wallis, Patrick; Nerlich, Brigitte 2005. Disease metaphors in new epidemics: The UK media framing of the 2003 SARS epidemic. – Social Science & Medicine, kd 60, nr 11, lk 2629–2639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.031